Benjamin Franklin’s religious outlook combined belief in God, concern for moral conduct, doubts about important Christian doctrines and cooperation with people whose theology he did not share. Calling him simply an orthodox Christian or a believer in a wholly inactive creator obscures parts of the evidence.
His autobiography, private religious writings, correspondence and public actions provide different kinds of testimony. Read together, they reveal a changing outlook in which useful conduct and freedom from sectarian hostility were recurring concerns.
A Puritan upbringing in Boston
Franklin grew up in Boston, rather than Philadelphia. In historian Thomas S. Kidd’s account, his family attended a Congregationalist church and belonged to the Puritan religious world of New England.
Kidd describes both Franklin’s youthful questioning and the continuing significance of relationships with committed Christians, including his sister Jane Mecom. Leaving behind his parents’ doctrinal certainty did not mean losing contact with their religious language or concerns.
The claim that he was brought up in an Anglican household and then followed a straightforward path away from Anglicanism is therefore misleading. His later connections in Philadelphia should not be substituted for his childhood setting.
Religious upbringing also does not settle a person’s mature convictions. It identifies an early context whose influence must be considered alongside what the person later wrote and did.
Deism is a useful description with limits
Franklin used the term deist in describing his early intellectual development. His doubts about inherited doctrine and his attention to reason connect him with a wider world of Enlightenment religious questioning.
Yet the label becomes less helpful if it is defined so rigidly that every statement about providence, worship or prayer must be ignored. Kidd’s interpretation emphasises precisely this complexity: Franklin questioned Christian teaching while retaining religious relationships and ways of thinking.
The historical question is consequently more precise than whether he belonged in one modern category. What did he affirm at a particular time, which doctrines did he question and how did his convictions affect his conduct?
He wrote a personal religious liturgy
The Library of Congress exhibition Benjamin Franklin: In His Own Words includes his manuscript Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion, dated November 20, 1728.
The exhibition explains that Franklin devised private articles of belief and a simple liturgy for Sunday use after becoming dissatisfied with formal services. This gives evidence of religious practice outside regular attendance at an established church.
It also complicates the assumption that questioning conventional theology must produce indifference to worship. Franklin could reject or reconsider particular claims while experimenting with a devotional form of his own.
The same exhibition discusses his 1725 pamphlet on liberty and necessity, written in London. It notes his later dissatisfaction with that youthful argument. His earliest published reasoning should therefore not be treated as a final statement that governed every subsequent decade.
Thirteen virtues and the discipline of self-examination
In the autobiography’s account of his plan for moral improvement, Franklin lists thirteen virtues: temperance, silence, order, resolution, frugality, industry, sincerity, justice, moderation, cleanliness, tranquillity, chastity and humility.
He attached a short practical rule to each and intended to focus on one virtue at a time. His method involved observing faults and cultivating habits rather than assuming that a general desire to be good was sufficient.
For humility, he named Jesus and Socrates as examples. His treatment of justice concerned both avoiding injury and failing to provide benefits that were a duty. The list therefore combines practical self-government with responsibilities toward others.
These are thirteen virtues, not a set of ten commandments invented by Franklin. They also show why describing his ethics as either entirely detached from religion or simply conventional church teaching would flatten the account.
The larger point is the importance he assigned to repeated conduct. A principle such as sincerity or industry became something to examine in daily behaviour, with progress depending on practice.
George Whitefield: cooperation without identical belief
Kidd describes Franklin’s business relationship and friendship with George Whitefield, the evangelical preacher associated with the Great Awakening. Their connection should not automatically be read as evidence that Franklin adopted Whitefield’s theology.
A letter to Whitefield dated July 6, 1749 illustrates Franklin’s interest in preaching as a means of encouraging exemplary behaviour. He considers how the conduct of influential people could affect others.
The letter is evidence of engagement with a preacher and with the social effects of religion. It does not establish an evangelical conversion or justify attributing every civic undertaking to revivalist fervour.
Friendship, commercial cooperation, admiration for character and agreement on doctrine are distinct relationships. Keeping them separate makes the association more intelligible.
The prayer proposal at the Constitutional Convention
On June 28, 1787, Franklin proposed that the Constitutional Convention begin its daily business with prayer. The National Park Service’s account, drawing on Madison’s notes, places the proposal amid difficult debates about representation.
The episode demonstrates that Franklin was willing to invoke divine assistance in a political setting. It does not show that the delegates adopted his proposal: the Convention adjourned without a vote on the motion.
That distinction matters when the episode is used to explain the Constitution. A delegate’s religious appeal, the assembly’s response and the resulting constitutional arrangements are separate pieces of evidence.
Nor can the proposal alone determine every detail of Franklin’s private theology. Public religious language has a setting and a purpose, and should be read alongside his personal statements.
His late statement of belief to Ezra Stiles
In his March 9, 1790 letter to Ezra Stiles, Franklin affirmed a creator who governs through providence, the propriety of worship, service to other people, immortality and moral accountability beyond this life.
Asked about Jesus, he praised Jesus’ moral teaching while expressing doubts about his divinity. He also said he had not studied that question closely and did not present his doubts as a settled demonstration.
The letter thus contains both positive religious convictions and limits on doctrinal assent. Its affirmation of providence is particularly difficult to reconcile with a description of his God as completely uninvolved in human affairs.
In the postscript, Franklin described assisting different religious groups with funds for places of worship and expressed a wish to remain at peace with them. Cooperation did not require him to find every doctrine convincing.
Conclusion
Franklin’s religious outlook is best understood through several connected commitments: belief in God and providence, emphasis on doing good, disciplined attention to character, theological questioning and willingness to cooperate across religious differences.
His own statements leave room for uncertainty, especially over Christian doctrine. Preserving that complexity gives a more useful account than turning him into a simple emblem of either doctrinal Christianity or complete religious disengagement.
Published by Ralf. About our editorial process.
