People sometimes call religion dangerous after seeing what can happen when leaders use spiritual authority to command obedience, when institutions protect their reputations at the expense of those they serve, or when a group puts its resources behind violence. These are distinct concerns. The response to Aum Shinrikyo’s organized violence in Japan and a British inquiry into child sexual abuse in religious settings show why it matters to identify who exercised authority, what harm occurred and what forms of accountability were available. Supreme Court of Japan on the Aum dissolution order Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, executive summary Inquiry findings on religious authority
When a group puts its resources behind violence
On March 20, 1995, members of Aum Shinrikyo carried out a sarin attack on the Tokyo subway during the morning rush hour. In the subsequent case on the group’s status as a religious corporation, Japan’s Supreme Court described how its leaders used organizational facilities and money and mobilized members in producing sarin. These facts matter because they identify the organization’s role in enabling the crime. The court considered what leaders and members had done with the resources they controlled. Japan’s Public Security Intelligence Agency on the 1995 attack Supreme Court of Japan on the Aum dissolution order
In January 1996, the Court upheld a dissolution order under the Religious Corporations Act. It recognized that dissolving the corporation would disrupt some religious activity but found the measure justified by the conduct established in the case. Liquidation would dispose of the organization’s assets, including facilities previously used for worship. The judgment explains that believers could continue to associate without the old corporation or acquire new facilities for religious acts. This distinguishes the practical disruption caused by losing property from a legal prohibition on the believers’ religious activity. In a separate process, Japan’s Public Security Examination Commission rejected a request in 1997 under the Subversive Activities Prevention Act. The two decisions concerned different powers under different laws. Distinguishing them helps explain the scope of each decision and why identifying the particular measure matters when considering its effect on religious freedom. Supreme Court of Japan on the Aum dissolution order Japan’s Public Security Examination Commission

When trust makes it hard to report abuse
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse examined religious organizations and settings in England and Wales and published its report on them in 2021. The issue it documented was different from a group directing an attack. It examined abuse and the conditions that could allow an individual to act or make it harder for a child or family to report what happened. The Inquiry heard evidence about deference to religious leaders and about situations where questioning someone seen as spiritually authoritative was difficult. It also documented concerns that reporting outside the organization would damage its reputation. Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, executive summary Inquiry findings on religious authority Inquiry findings on reporting and reputation
A trusted leader can be the person a family first turns to. Difficulties arise when that leader or their colleagues control what happens next and have an interest in keeping the complaint inside the institution. The Inquiry documented variation in how religious settings responded. Its report describes a gurdwara in Ealing whose policy identifies the local authority’s children’s service as a point of escalation and directs people to the police if a child is at immediate risk. The example shows how a community can name its own safeguarding contact while also identifying authorities outside the institution. Inquiry findings on reporting and reputation Inquiry examples of reporting procedures
The report recommended that religious organizations have child protection policies and procedures and that the government address gaps in oversight of certain education settings. These recommendations describe what the Inquiry thought should change. They concern how institutions organize their work with children, how concerns are recorded and where allegations can go. The substance lies in whether people understand the procedure and whether an organization follows it when its own reputation or leadership is at stake. In the Inquiry’s account, a policy that gives the name of an outside agency does something more specific than asking members to trust their leaders. It gives a family an identifiable route when the person responsible for receiving the complaint is close to the person it concerns. Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, executive summary Inquiry examples of reporting procedures
What religious freedom protects
Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights protects freedom of thought, conscience and religion, including the freedom to hold a belief and manifest it individually or with others. The article protects people from coercion in choosing a belief. It also specifies conditions under which a state may restrict the manifestation of a religion or belief, including the need for a legal basis and necessity to protect public safety or the fundamental rights of others. That distinction matters when a public response addresses conduct that has harmed people while members of a community retain their convictions. Supreme Court of Japan on the Aum dissolution order International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Conclusion
Concerns about religion can arise from specific uses of authority and failures of accountability. Aum’s use of organizational resources for an attack and the barriers to reporting abuse documented by the British Inquiry called for different responses. Identifying who acted, what enabled the harm and what outside institutions could do makes those responses more precise. It also makes clear where religious freedom and the protection of people from harm both have a place. Supreme Court of Japan on the Aum dissolution order Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, executive summary Inquiry examples of reporting procedures International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Published by Ralf. About our editorial process.




