People can fight over religion when a religious affiliation helps determine what is at stake in a struggle over land, political representation or safety. The partition of British India in 1947 shows how this can happen. In Punjab, officials were asked to draw a border using religious majorities. The report they produced, a map of proposed lines and a survivor’s account tell us about different decisions people faced as the new border took shape. Nehru Archive, terms of reference for the boundary commissions · UK National Archives, Partition documents · Partition Museum, Sahib Singh Virdi’s oral history
Religious affiliation became a criterion for a border
As Britain withdrew, Punjab was divided between India and Pakistan. The commission’s instructions treated connected areas with Muslim or non-Muslim majorities as the starting point for the boundary. They also asked the commission to consider other factors. The categories grouped people for a territorial decision. In Punjab, for example, the designation “non-Muslim” included people from distinct communities, including Sikhs and Hindus. At the public sittings in Lahore, counsel presented cases for the Indian National Congress, the Muslim League and Sikh members of the Punjab Legislative Assembly. The terms and proceedings show how affiliation, representation and territory became connected. Nehru Archive, terms of reference for the boundary commissions · Cyril Radcliffe, report of the Punjab Boundary Commission
Maps had to account for competing claims and shared systems
A map in the UK National Archives shows the line eventually awarded and a dashed line marking a Sikh claim along the Chenab. A boundary proposal was a position put before the commission. It could differ from the line the chairman ultimately drew. In his report, Cyril Radcliffe discusses areas of Muslim majority east of the Sutlej and explains why he weighed railway connections and water systems against the claim based on majority. He also notes that the Dipalpur Canal serving areas in West Punjab drew water from the Ferozepore headworks. The line divided territory through which people and resources had moved. Cyril Radcliffe, report of the Punjab Boundary Commission · UK National Archives, Partition documents
A household faced a different set of decisions
The final boundaries were announced on 17 August, after independence celebrations. The transfer of power was accompanied by mass migration and violence, some of it organized. In an oral history preserved by the Partition Museum, Sahib Singh Virdi recalls his family heading toward Dera Baba Nanak. To avoid mobs they took a longer route through Jammu and Kashmir. His account records the choices and dangers one family remembers. The commission’s papers tell us how a boundary was decided. The testimony tells us how people had to find a way to safety as the region was being divided. UK National Archives, Partition documents · Partition Museum, Sahib Singh Virdi’s oral history
Conclusion
In Punjab, religion mattered as a way of defining majorities and making territorial claims. Which line officials drew also depended on infrastructure and political decisions, while violence and fear shaped what families could do. Understanding a conflict requires evidence about how people acted on religious distinctions and about the institutions and conditions that made those distinctions consequential.
Published by Ralf. About our editorial process.
